Top 10 Cass Alternatives in 2025

Discover the top 10 alternative telecom expense management tools to streamline costs and boost efficiency in 2025.

Telecom Expense Management (TEM) software is essential for enterprises looking to streamline their telecom operations and manage costs effectively. Cass Information Systems offers a range of TEM services, including fixed telecom expense management, mobility management, and cloud management, aimed at enhancing efficiency and cost savings for businesses.

What is Cass?

Cass Information Systems specializes in managing telecom expenses for enterprises globally. They offer a range of services to help organizations manage their telecom and cloud expenses, ensuring cost savings and operational efficiency.

Unique features include ExpenseSmart for detailed expense insights, high customer satisfaction, and global execution in over 185 countries. Cass is also a US Federal Reserve member bank, providing financial stability and robust payment capabilities.

What to Consider When Selecting a Cass Alternative?

  1. Cost Optimization: Look for platforms that offer robust cost optimization features, such as automated cost validation and deep cost optimization, to ensure you are not overpaying for telecom services.
  2. Integration Capabilities: Ensure the platform can integrate seamlessly with existing systems like HR, Finance, MDM, and procurement systems to streamline workflows and improve data accuracy.
  3. Global Reach: Choose a provider with a global execution capability to manage telecom expenses across multiple countries, ensuring consistent service and cost savings worldwide.
  4. Customer Support: Opt for a solution that offers 24/7 customer support and a dedicated support team to address any issues promptly and efficiently.
  5. Comprehensive Reporting: Select a platform that provides detailed and customizable reporting features to gain insights into telecom expenses, identify cost-saving opportunities, and ensure transparency.

Best Alternatives to Cass in 2025

1. Lightyear

Lightyear automates and optimizes how companies source and manage their internet, WAN, voice, and colocation with data-driven software. Our mission is to transform the antiquated B2B telecom industry by driving positive, durable change in this multi-trillion dollar space. We operate in a remote-first, distributed working environment, emphasizing high performance, continuous improvement, and a solutions-oriented approach to problem-solving.

Pros of Using Lightyear

Lightyear offers a range of features that make it a compelling choice for managing telecom expenses.

  • Automated Cost Validation: Lightyear's platform automatically validates telecom costs, ensuring you only pay for what you use.
  • Seamless Integration: The software integrates effortlessly with existing systems like HR, Finance, and procurement, streamlining workflows and improving data accuracy.
  • Global Execution: Lightyear provides consistent service and cost savings across multiple countries, making it ideal for global enterprises.
  • 24/7 Customer Support: With round-the-clock customer support, any issues are addressed promptly and efficiently.
  • Detailed Reporting: The platform offers customizable reporting features, providing insights into telecom expenses and identifying cost-saving opportunities.

These are just a few of Lightyear's many features. Check them out here to learn more.

Who should use Lightyear?

Lightyear primarily targets businesses in the B2B telecom sector, including companies that require internet connectivity, wide area networking (WAN), voice services, and data center/colocation services. Our solutions are ideal for enterprises looking to optimize their telecom procurement, network inventory management, and bill consolidation processes.

Lightyear Pricing

Lightyear offers custom pricing tailored to meet the unique needs of each customer. To get a personalized quote, feel free to schedule a demo here.

Lightyear Reviews

Lightyear has a perfect score of 5.0 out of 5 stars on G2. Users praise the ease of use, significant time savings in procurement processes, competitive pricing, effective project management, high level of customer support, comprehensive service offerings, and streamlined processes. Check out more of our reviews here!

2. Bluewater Control

Bluewater Control is a SaaS platform designed to streamline mobile lifecycle and telecom expense management. It offers features like managing orders, consolidating telecom billing, and optimizing service spend, making it ideal for finance and IT teams looking to improve governance and reduce costs.

Pros of Using Bluewater Control

  • Customised Catalogues and Approval Workflows: Manage ordering and MSP requests through tailored catalogues and approval processes.
  • Device and Service Management: Assign, manage, and report on devices and services against users and cost centres.
  • Telecom Billing Consolidation: Consolidate and report on telecom billing from multiple carriers.
  • Service and Device Spend Optimization: Eliminate wastage by optimizing service and device spend.

Cons of Using Bluewater Control

  • Lack of User Reviews: The absence of user reviews on platforms like Capterra might indicate a lack of user feedback or potential issues that have not been documented, making it difficult to gauge the software's effectiveness and reliability.
  • Limited Integration Capabilities: Bluewater Control has 0 integrations listed, which could be a significant limitation for users needing extensive integration capabilities with other systems and tools.

Bluewater Control Pricing

Bluewater Control's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Bluewater Control Reviews

Bluewater Control has a score of 0.0 out of 5 on Capterra, indicating no reviews have been submitted yet. There is no user feedback available for Bluewater Control.

Check out more Bluewater Control reviews here.

3. Sakon

Sakon offers a cloud-based platform designed to manage telecom expenses and services, aiming to improve network services, control IT costs, and automate telecom management workflows.

Pros of Using Sakon

  • Integrated Platform: One platform to manage all communication services, streamlining telecom management.
  • Cloud-Based: The world's first cloud-based platform for managing the communication ecosystem, offering unparalleled accessibility and scalability.
  • Automation: Automates key telecom management workflows, reducing manual effort and increasing efficiency.
  • Global Reach: Services in 100 countries, ensuring consistent telecom management across international operations.

Cons of Using Sakon

  • Complexity in Integration: Integrating Sakon's platform with existing systems can be complex and time-consuming, potentially requiring significant IT resources and expertise.
  • Cost of Implementation: The comprehensive nature of Sakon's platform may come with high implementation and maintenance costs, which could be a concern for smaller enterprises.

Sakon Pricing

Sakon's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Sakon Reviews

Sakon has a score of 3.8 out of 5 on G2. Users generally mention issues with integration complexity and high implementation costs. Check out more Sakon reviews here.

4. TEMEdge

TEMEdge is a cloud-enabled expense management solution designed to automate, optimize, and manage technology spending for organizations. It offers a modular platform that provides services such as invoice processing, inventory management, invoice auditing, dispute management, contract management, accounts payable, and reporting.

Pros of Using TEMEdge

  • Integrated: Leverages common data such as cost center information and provides centralized views of inventory across modules.
  • Modular: Offers a choice of modules based on requirements, allowing for expansion as needs grow.
  • Scalable: Supports multiple locations and maps reports and EDI from vendors to the database for accurate validation.
  • Synchronized: Automates and synchronizes exchanges between technology vendor feeds to eliminate duplicate data entry.

Cons of Using TEMEdge

  • Complexity: The platform offers a wide range of features and modules, which might be overwhelming for new users or small organizations with limited IT resources.
  • Integration Challenges: While the platform is designed to integrate with various vendor feeds and systems, there might be challenges in achieving seamless integration, especially with legacy systems.

TEMEdge Pricing

TEMEdge's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

TEMEdge Reviews

TEMEdge has a score of 0.0 out of 5 based on 0 reviews. There are no user reviews available for TEMEdge, so no general user opinions can be derived.

Check out more TEMEdge reviews here.

5. Calero

Calero specializes in managed technology solutions, offering comprehensive telecom expense management services designed to streamline processes, reduce costs, and enhance efficiency for enterprises.

Pros of Using Calero

  • Wireline eBonding: Calero is the only TEM provider certified as a carrier integrator to Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) standards.
  • Award-Winning Inventory Technology: Provides deeper and more accurate insights into telecom inventory data by pulling data directly from vendor APIs and validating it against billing records.
  • Expertise in Migration: Experienced in seamlessly migrating large enterprises onto their platforms.

Cons of Using Calero

  • Complexity: The app is considered complex and difficult to use by some users, which can hinder productivity and user adoption.
  • Inefficiency: There are mentions of inefficiency in certain aspects of the app, leading to potential delays and frustration for users.

Calero Pricing

Calero's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Calero Reviews

Calero has a rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars on G2. Users generally mention issues with the interface being difficult to navigate and problems with communication and support from the account team. Check out more Calero reviews here.

6. Genuity

Genuity offers a comprehensive platform for managing telecom expenses, providing visibility, control, and actionable insights to discover savings opportunities. The platform integrates telecom management with other IT services, allowing businesses to track usage, expenses, and network assets across all vendors.

Pros of Using Genuity

  • Comprehensive Cost Analysis: Integration of telecom, SaaS, vendors, services, and contracts for a holistic view.
  • Expense Optimization: Automatic detection of unexpected changes and better contract negotiations.
  • Community-Driven Pricing: Leveraging community data to optimize pricing and investment.

Cons of Using Genuity

  • Missing Features: Genuity lacks several key functionalities, such as the ability to push software to laptops and manage its own Single Sign-On (SSO), which can limit its effectiveness for comprehensive IT management.
  • Slow Updates: Users have reported that updates to the platform are infrequent, which can result in prolonged periods where known issues remain unresolved and new features are not added promptly.

GenuityPricing

Genuity's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Genuity Reviews

Genuity has a score of 4.7 out of 5 on G2. Users generally mention missing features and slow updates. Check out more Genuity reviews here.

7. zLinq

zLinq specializes in helping IT teams manage their telecom and technology investments, focusing on WAN, Unified Communications, and Contact Center solutions. Their services include a Customer Dashboard for real-time visibility, Inventory & Audit for telecom assets, Optimization for cost savings, Lifecycle Management, Strategic Advisory Services, and Invoice Processing.

Pros of Using zLinq

  • Customer Dashboard: Provides real-time visibility into the communications environment, helping manage costs and align priorities.
  • Visualization Toolkit: Collects, analyzes, and decodes infrastructure data in near-real time, offering comprehensive insights.
  • Dedicated Client Services Manager: Helps align priorities with savings and technology roadmaps, ensuring strategic alignment.
  • Risk-Sharing Partner Model: Takes on the burden of change and guarantees results, providing peace of mind and assured outcomes.

Cons of Using zLinq

  • Complex Onboarding Process: Some customers may find the initial onboarding process a bit complex, particularly if they are transitioning from another provider. Clearer instructions or a more hands-on setup service could alleviate this.
  • Perceived Savings Issues: Higher management may not appreciate how zLinq specifies 'savings,' as their deals often result in spending more overall, despite better service and decreasing price per service.

zLinq Pricing

zLinq's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

zLinq Reviews

zLinq has a score of 4.8 out of 5 on G2. Users generally mention a complex onboarding process and perceived savings issues. Check out more zLinq reviews here.

8. Billmonitor

Billmonitor helps users choose and manage their mobile services by reducing mobile phone expenses and improving cost transparency. It analyzes various mobile service providers and offers solutions for different sectors, including small SMEs, large corporates, and the public sector.

Pros of Using Billmonitor

  • Advanced mathematical analysis: Using advanced maths to turn the complexity of bills and tariffs into simple, actionable intelligence.
  • Free, no obligation consultation: Billmonitor offers a free consultation to discuss the findings of their analysis.
  • Collaboration with Value Match: Billmonitor works with Value Match to ensure their services are purpose-focused and value-driven.

Cons of Using Billmonitor

  • Limited User Feedback: The absence of user reviews on platforms like TrustRadius might indicate a lack of user feedback or potential issues that have not been documented, making it difficult to gauge the software's effectiveness and reliability.
  • Confusing User Interface: The form for estimating savings has placeholder text like "Section title" and "Section description," which may confuse users and hinder the user experience.

BillmonitorPricing

Billmonitor's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Billmonitor Reviews

Billmonitor has a score of 0.0 out of 5 on TrustRadius, indicating no reviews have been submitted yet. There is no user feedback available for Billmonitor.

Check out more Billmonitor reviews here.

9. Velocity

Velocity offers a comprehensive Telecom Expense Management (TEM) platform called Global Expense Management (GEM), designed to optimize telecom expenses, automate processes, and provide 24/7 support for businesses. GEM leverages advanced technologies like Robotic Process Automation, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning to enhance efficiency and strategic planning.

Pros of Using Velocity

  • Auditing Tools: Ensure precise cost control and compliance, eliminating unnecessary costs and expenses.
  • Data Flexibility: Ability to pull in non-standard data sources and formats for customized inputs.
  • Savings Tracker: Single pane of glass visibility into all telecom cost savings and recoveries.
  • 24/7/365 U.S. Based Support: Dedicated support team available around the clock.

Cons of Using Velocity

  • Complexity in Data Integration: While GEM offers data flexibility by pulling in non-standard data sources, this could also mean a more complex setup and integration process, which might require additional time and resources.
  • Dependence on Support: Although GEM provides 24/7/365 U.S. based support, businesses might become heavily dependent on this support for troubleshooting and maintenance, potentially leading to delays if support is not immediately available.

Velocity Pricing

Velocity's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Velocity Reviews

Velocity has a score of 3.6 out of 5 on Google reviews, with users generally mentioning issues with service quality and support. Check out more Velocity reviews here.

10. GoExceed Mobil(X)

GoExceed Mobil(X) offers a comprehensive enterprise cellular management solution that leverages advanced technologies like Azure, machine learning, and AI to optimize carrier contracts, manage assets, and reduce costs.

Pros of Using GoExceed Mobil(X)

  • Automated Data Asset Mobile Management (ADAMM): Uses Azure, machine learning, and AI to interpret carrier contracts and maximize discounts.
  • OneSYNC Integration: Seamlessly integrates with MDM, help desk ticketing, asset management, carrier portal, HR, and ERP systems.
  • Solve(X) Portal: Powered by Microsoft, it simplifies data management using Azure, PowerBI, and Neural technologies.
  • Mobile Intel: Provides data-driven insights using Power BI.

Cons of Using GoExceed Mobil(X)

  • Overwhelming Interface: The interface can be overwhelming with a lot of information, making it difficult for users to navigate and find what they need efficiently.
  • Initial Integration Issues: The MDM integration did not work initially, which could cause delays and additional troubleshooting for users trying to set up the system.

GoExceed Mobil(X) Pricing

GoExceed Mobil(X)'s pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

GoExceed Mobil(X) Reviews

GoExceed Mobil(X) has a score of 4.7 out of 5 on G2. Users generally mention an overwhelming interface and initial integration issues. Check out more GoExceed Mobil(X) reviews here.

Which One Should You Go With?

While all these platforms offer robust solutions for managing telecom expenses, Lightyear stands out with its automated cost validation, seamless integration, and global execution capabilities. If you're looking for a reliable and efficient alternative, Lightyear is a top choice. However, each option has its unique strengths, so consider your specific needs to find the best fit for your organization.

Want to learn more about how Lightyear can help you?

Let us show you the product and discuss specifics on how it might be helpful.

Schedule a Demo
Join our mailing list

Stay up to date on our product, straight to your inbox every month.

Contact information successfully received
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.