WebSocket vs RPC: Comparing Communication Protocols

When building or managing software systems, choosing the right communication protocol is a foundational decision. Two common approaches you'll encounter are WebSocket and Remote Procedure Call (RPC).

Both protocols allow different parts of a system to exchange information, but they do so in fundamentally different ways. This guide will compare them directly, explaining their core functions and ideal use cases to help you decide which is the right fit for your organization's technical requirements.

What is WebSocket?

WebSocket is a communication protocol that enables two-way, real-time communication between a client (like a web browser) and a server. It establishes a single, long-lived connection, allowing both parties to send data back and forth simultaneously without needing to re-establish a connection for each exchange.

This continuous, "full-duplex" connection is what sets it apart from traditional web communication, which typically follows a request-response model. With WebSocket, the server can push information to the client as soon as it's available, making it highly efficient for applications that require instant data updates.

• Persistent Connection: It maintains a single open connection between the client and server.
• Full-Duplex Communication: Data can flow in both directions at the same time.
• Low Latency: By eliminating the overhead of opening new connections for each message, it significantly reduces delays.
• Stateful Protocol: The connection remains aware of the communication state, unlike the stateless nature of HTTP.

What is RPC (Remote Procedure Call)?

Remote Procedure Call, or RPC, is a protocol that allows a program on one computer to execute a function on another computer without needing to understand the underlying network details. In this model, the client sends a request to a remote server to execute a specific procedure and waits for the result to be returned. It effectively makes a network request look like a simple, local function call to the developer.

This action-oriented approach is designed to trigger specific commands on a remote system.

• Request-Response Model: Communication is initiated by the client, which sends a request and then waits for the server to process it and send back a reply.
• High Abstraction: It hides the complexity of network communication, allowing developers to call remote functions as if they were local.
• Action-Oriented: RPC is structured around executing commands, such as retrieving user data or processing a payment.
• Language-Neutral Frameworks: Modern RPC implementations, like gRPC, enable communication between services written in different programming languages.

WebSocket vs RPC: Key Differences

While both protocols connect services, they are built on different philosophies that affect how they operate. Here are the primary distinctions an IT decision-maker should understand.

1. Communication Flow

The most significant difference lies in how data is exchanged. A WebSocket connection is a persistent two-way street where data can flow freely in either direction once the connection is open.

RPC, on the other hand, operates like a series of one-way streets with a return trip. The client must always initiate the conversation by calling a specific function on the server and then waiting for a direct response.

2. Data Structure and Overhead

WebSocket is flexible about data format; it simply transports messages. This results in very low overhead per message after the initial connection is made, as there's no need to send repetitive headers.

RPC is more structured. Each request is tightly coupled to a function and its specific parameters. This can introduce more overhead per call, as each request-response cycle is a distinct transaction that may include its own metadata and headers.

3. Level of Abstraction

RPC is designed to provide a high level of abstraction. It makes a remote function call feel just like a local one, hiding the underlying network communication from the developer.

WebSocket offers a lower-level abstraction. It gives developers direct access to a communication pipe, offering more control but also requiring them to define the messaging protocol and manage the connection state more explicitly.

Use Cases for WebSocket

Because WebSocket maintains an open connection, it's the go-to choice for applications where information must be delivered to the user instantly without them needing to refresh a page. Its strengths are most apparent in systems that depend on a continuous stream of data from the server.

• Real-Time Monitoring Dashboards: For IT teams tracking network health or application performance, WebSocket can push live metrics and alerts to a central dashboard. This provides an immediate, up-to-the-second view of system status.
• Collaborative Workspaces: Applications that allow multiple users to edit a document or use a digital whiteboard simultaneously rely on WebSocket to instantly broadcast changes to all participants, ensuring everyone sees the same version of the project.
• Live Chat and Customer Support: In both internal messaging platforms and external customer support portals, WebSocket enables messages to be delivered instantly. This creates a fluid, conversational experience similar to a desktop messaging app.
• Financial and IoT Data Feeds: From streaming stock market data to receiving updates from Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, WebSocket provides the low-latency connection needed to handle high-frequency data feeds efficiently.

Use Cases for RPC

RPC is best suited for systems where the primary need is to execute specific commands on a remote server. Its request-response nature makes it a reliable choice for action-oriented tasks that don't require a continuous data stream.

• Internal Service Communication: In modern microservices architectures, different services often need to "talk" to each other to complete a task. For example, an ordering service might use an RPC call to ask an inventory service to confirm stock availability. This creates a clear, command-based interaction between components.
• Standard APIs: RPC is a natural fit for building APIs where clients perform distinct actions, such as retrieving a user's profile, submitting a form, or processing a payment. Each action maps directly to a remote procedure call.
• Infrastructure Management and Automation: IT teams can use RPC to execute administrative tasks on remote machines, like triggering a data backup, restarting a server, or applying a configuration update. The call initiates the action, and the response confirms its completion.
• Distributed Data Processing: In complex data pipelines, one system can use an RPC call to instruct another system to perform a specific computation or transformation on a dataset. The call acts as a trigger to move the process to its next stage.

Choosing Between WebSocket and RPC

The right choice depends less on which protocol is "better" and more on which one aligns with your application's specific needs. To make a clear decision, consider the following factors.

1. Evaluate Your Data Flow Needs

The fundamental question is who needs to initiate communication. Is your system event-driven, requiring the server to push data to clients instantly?

If so, WebSocket's persistent, two-way connection is the appropriate tool. It's built for scenarios where the server sends updates without a client request.

Conversely, if your interactions are always client-initiated commands, RPC offers a simpler, action-oriented model. The client asks, and the server responds.

2. Consider Your Architectural Style

Your system's design also plays a critical role, especially in a microservices environment.

RPC frameworks often provide rigid contracts that define how services interact. This structure is highly beneficial for maintaining order and clarity between dozens of internal services.

WebSocket provides a more flexible data pipe. While powerful for client-facing features, it requires more custom logic to manage complex inter-service communication.

3. Assess Performance and Scalability

Finally, look at your specific performance profile. For frequent, small messages, WebSocket's low-overhead nature is more efficient after the initial connection.

RPC's request-response cycle carries overhead with each call, making it better suited for less frequent, discrete actions.

Also, consider how state is managed. Stateless RPC calls are often simpler to load balance and scale horizontally than stateful WebSocket connections.

Final Thoughts on WebSocket and RPC

Ultimately, WebSocket and RPC are not direct competitors but specialized tools for different communication needs. Your choice should be guided by the specific interaction pattern your application requires.

WebSocket excels when you need a persistent, two-way connection for real-time data. If your system relies on the server pushing updates to clients instantly, such as for monitoring dashboards or live chat, WebSocket is the clear choice.

In contrast, RPC is designed for command-based, client-initiated actions. It provides a straightforward way for services to request specific tasks from one another, making it ideal for internal microservices communication and standard API development.

By analyzing whether your system needs a continuous data stream or a simple request-response model, you can confidently select the protocol that best supports your architecture and performance goals.

Need Help Managing Your Network? Lightyear Can Help

Choosing the right communication protocol is critical, but so is managing the network services that support your applications. By automating network service procurement, inventory management, and bill consolidation, Lightyear takes the pain out of telecom infrastructure management.

The hundreds of enterprises who trust Lightyear achieve 70%+ time savings and 20%+ cost savings on their network services. Schedule a demo or get started with our questionnaire today.

Frequently Asked Questions about WebSocket vs RPC

Can WebSocket and RPC be used together in the same application?

Yes, absolutely. A common pattern is to use RPC for standard API requests like user authentication, while using WebSocket for a real-time feature like a notification feed. They solve different problems and can complement each other effectively.

Is one protocol inherently more secure than the other?

Neither is inherently more secure; security depends on the implementation. Both support encryption (WSS for WebSocket, TLS for RPC). RPC frameworks may offer more built-in security features, but a properly configured WebSocket connection is equally robust.

How does gRPC relate to these two protocols?

gRPC is a modern, high-performance framework for RPC. It is not a direct competitor to WebSocket. While gRPC excels at efficient service-to-service communication, WebSocket remains the standard for pushing real-time, event-driven data directly to clients like web browsers.